Rampart * * *

20120505-135027.jpg

Director: Oren Moverman.
Screenplay: James Ellroy, Oren Moverman.
Starring: Woody Harrelson, Robin Wright, Ned Beatty, Anne Heche, Cynthia Nixon, Sigourney Weaver, Ice Cube, Ben Foster, Steve Buscemi, Brie Larson, Audra McDonald, Robert Wisdom, Jon Bernthal, Jon Foster, Stella Schnabel.

L.A. Confidential” was an exceptional adaptation of hard-boiled, crime writer James Ellroy’s novel. Most other adaptations tend to be flawed. “Dark Blue“, “The Black Dahlia” and “Street Kings” had decent material but didn’t grip as well as they should have. This is another that suffers from a similar problem.

In 1999, the Rampart division of the Los Angeles Police Force is rife with corruption. Amongst, the main culprits is ‘Date Rape’ Dave Brown (Woody Harrelson). He’s a cop that plays by his own rules and lives by an old-school code. His reputation precedes him and is heightened even further when he’s caught on video assaulting a driver who crashes into him. To try and thwart the attention of the media and ever increasing public frustration, his superiors suggest retirement. Dave refuses and attempts a legal case but it only draws him deeper into his murky past.

Three years previously, Woody Harrelson, Ben Foster and Steve Buscemi were all involved in Oren Moverman’s brilliant directorial debut “The Messenger“. They all assemble again for this but where Moverman showed a skilful subtlety in his debut, he decides to get a bit flashy with this one. That’s his first mistake. He teases a powerful performance from Harrelson – like he did before – but he doesn’t utilise Foster or Buscemi the way he should. That’s his second mistake. And as if that’s not enough, he has James Ellroy himself, co-writing the screenplay with him, yet the focus is on one character – rather than tapping into Ellroy’s abilities in convoluted narrative arcs. Three strikes and you’re out Oren. That being said though, the character of Dave Brown and Harrelson’s strong central performance provide enough powerful material to hold your interest. There’s a real intensity to the man and Harrelson delivers the perfect balance of a man teetering on the brink of the immorality. He received an Oscar nomination for “The Messenger” but I actually think this is a better performance. Moverman doesn’t do him any favours though. He employs a flamboyant handheld approach that’s so distracting that is verges on awful and it detracts from the drama. A good director shouldn’t be noticed before his performers. Speaking of which, the supporting cast is impressively assembled but few get any substantial screen time, leaving the descent of Dave Brown the film’s main focus, much in the same way as Harvey Keitel’s “Bad Lieutenant“. Where that film succeeded though was in having the courage of it’s convictions. This threatens to but draws to a less than satisfactory conclusion.

If it wasn’t for Harrelson, this film wouldn’t have worked as well as it does. Moverman rightly received plaudits for his debut but he has gotten a bit ahead of himself here. Hopefully he’ll learn his lesson for next time.

Mark Walker

20120505-135147.jpg

About these ads

7 Responses to “Rampart * * *”

  1. I had heard that this was really good… but I’m less inclined to seek it out now. It’s out for home video somehow already I take it?

    Like

    • I’d still have a look Fogs. I can see why people would like it. I found it hard to rate it with only 3 stars as there was loads to enjoy but it wasn’t in the same league as The Messenger for me. Harrelson is outstanding though. I’m not normally a fan of his but over the last few years I’m warming to him. It’s worth it for him alone.

      Like

  2. Great review, Mark. I had heard before that the movie wasn’t very good but the central performance was, so that was what interested me. I loved Moverman’s debut The Messenger, such a heart-wrenching drama with astounding performances, specially by Foster, Morton and Buscemi.

    Like

    • Again, I should have rated this with another 1/2 star but when I compared it to the brilliant work of The Messenger, I felt 3 star was enough. It’s not a bad film, it’s just delivered badly. That ultimately rests with Moverman and there are so many actors wasted. Foster and especially Buscemi being two of them.

      Like

  3. Great review. I also have that problem sometimes where I give a movie 3 stars and people say they aren’t going to see it right away. It’s still a positive rating.

    Like

    • I agree. On the surface it might seem like your being unkind. I actually felt a bit like I was letting the film down a bit but as you say, i still regard it a good rating. Once a film recieved a 2 1/2 star or lower that’s when you could do without them. Thats the way I seen it anyway.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,137 other followers

%d bloggers like this: