It Follows
Director: David Robert Mitchell.
Screenplay: David Robert Mitchell.
Starring: Maika Monroe, Keir Gilchrist, Lili Sepe, Olivia Luccardi, Jake Weary, Daniel Zovatto, Deborah Williams, Ele Bardha, Bailey Spry.
“It could look like someone you know or it could be a stranger in a crowd. Whatever helps it get close to you”
Too often with contemporary horror films we are subjected to a barrage of positive claims. Claims that the most recent one is the best for decades. It almost seems like audiences and critics are desperate for it to actually be the case, such is the lack of any true quality in a failing genre and the desperate demand to be spooked again. Sooner or later, though, one had to arrive where the positivity surrounding it would be genuine. Finally, we have It Follows: a film thatย can confidently stake it’s claim for being that coveted frightener.
After a sexual encounter, 19-year-old Jay (Maika Monroe) is told that she will then be followed by a presence – someone or something – determined to kill her. The only way it’ll stop is if she has another sexual encounter where she can pass it on. Initially, she’s doubtful but soon enough the disturbing visions begin…
If you’re ever in any doubt that you’re being stalked by a malevolent force of some kind, then it’s probably best to steer clear of the old rumpy-pumpy. Going by the usual horror tropes, when someone butters the muffin it inevitably leads to their demise. And by that, director David Robert Mitchell cleverly bases his entire horror concept around that promiscuous premise.
What works in It Follows‘ favour is it’s homage to films of old – namely, John Carpenter’s Halloween. If you consider Carpenter’s depiction of Michael Myers, you’ll notice that he works slowly and never in a rush to fulfil his murderous intent. That’s very much like the entity in this; there’s a self-assurance in it’s unrelenting pursuit. The setting also takes place in a similar leafy suburban neighbourhood and our protagonist goes by the name of Jay (short for Jamie) – a direct tribute to Halloween‘s afflicted heroine, Jamie Lee Curtis. Even Rich Vreeland’s scaled down music echoes Carpenter’s classic synthesised score.
You could actually spend some time identifying the previous horrors that Mitchell riffs on but that would detract from his own work and his ability to put his own stamp on the proceedings. His decision to shoot with a sombre mood and deliberate pace adds to the overall foreboding atmosphere and allows us to effortlessly enter into any given moment. This works the same in identifying with the characters. Their plight and struggle is all the more involving because it feels like we are getting a glimpse into their lives. It also helps that the cast is headed by reliable, and relatively unknown, faces and as the characters are in their teens, the film works as both an urban-legend horror and a dark coming-of-age tale. Their progression to adulthood and their promiscuity also sets up a clever sub-text that courses through the film in terms of sexually transmitted diseases: a reminiscent 80’s setting suggesting the AIDS epidemic, in particular, and channels the deadly nature of that disease as it’s psychological device.
Mitchell’s real trump card, however, comes from his use of space and setting up his shots. The background plays a major part in the film as you never know at which moment “It” might make an appearance, leaving you to regularly scan the whole frame for any movement.There’s an undoubted ambiguity to Mitchell’s film and while some may balk at this I, personally, welcomed it as it added another thought provoking layer. It works on many levels. If you’re so inclined, you can adopt a metaphorical approach to the proceedings and delve into it’s deeper meanings. But then again, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, right? If your not the type of viewer that wishes to explore the metaphors and just want to be entertained then the film can still be enjoyed at face value and works as a chilling and effective horror yarn, nonetheless.
In only his second film (the first being The Myth of the American Sleepover in 2010) there’s no denying David Robert Mitchell’s commanding handling of events and his ability to stage a real sense of uneasiness. It’s an impressive sophomore effort that has given the horror genre a much needed shot in the arm by delivering substantial terrors and retaining a sincerity in its delivery.
Mark Walker
Trivia: Following overwhelmingly positive first weekend reception from critics and audiences, the film’s originally-planned VOD/theatrical release was cancelled in favor of a theatrical-only release.
November 11, 2015 at 6:58 pm
It’s a good one, alright. An interesting use of STDs as a horror theme. Fine review, Mark.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 11, 2015 at 7:49 pm
Thanks Michael. Using the STD angle is a stroke of genius. It allows Mitchell to, not only, reference the tropes of past horrors but to build his whole film around one. Very clever and very well delivered.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 11, 2015 at 7:14 pm
Awesome as usual, Mark. I like this new twist–first the monster in The Babadook was grief. Now we have STD as the monster. I appreciate the symbolism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 11, 2015 at 7:52 pm
Thanks Cindy. It seems that horrors are trying to tap into something different that a contemporary audience can appreciate. It augers well for the genre if they can keep it up.
I wonder what’s next?… In our current financial climate, I wonder if we’ll get an austerity horror?! Some poor soul being stalked by a banker! ๐
LikeLike
November 11, 2015 at 8:49 pm
Or a politician from the wrong side ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 11, 2015 at 9:46 pm
Haha! Indeed! ๐
LikeLike
November 11, 2015 at 9:35 pm
Nice review Mark. While I loved the atmosphere of It Follows, the plot seemed kind of a mess to me. Jay’s decision making felt unrealistic and during multiple parts of the picture I wanted to yell at her for recklessly endangering herself. It’s not a bad film but I don’t see it as the modern day horror classic most people are making it out to be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 11, 2015 at 9:55 pm
Ha! You sound like I often do when a new horror is claimed as a modern classic, Charles. ๐
I know exactly how you feel. That said, It Follows was one that really worked for me. It’s not perfect and I did find flaws but I found it to be quite cleverly constructed and the biggest plus point was that it stayed me for days afterwards. I’ve not had a horror do that to me for a while.
A modern classic? Probably not. But I still found it to be a satisfying addition to a genre that seriously failing us these days.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 11, 2015 at 9:56 pm
Great work ya great plonker.
๐
This movie is freaking excellent, but I will admit the thing I’m remembering most about it (and most fondly) is its haunting soundtrack. So cool and unique. But this has a lot of other things going for it as well, namely restraint. So nice to see someone using it as well as James Wan did in The Conjuring. There’s hope for this genre yet!
LikeLike
November 11, 2015 at 10:03 pm
Haha! Thank you (on both accounts) I’ve been called much worse. ๐
With you here, though, man. A solid little flick. The music was great, the way it was shot was superb and, yes, the restraint does really add to believability of the whole thing. I enjoyed a lot about The Conjuring but still left it a bit disappointed after a strong start. This is a different type of horror for me and the restraint here worked far more effectively. Despite some minor flaws, it’s the best I’ve seen from recent horror flicks!
LikeLike
November 11, 2015 at 10:37 pm
Great review! There’s a lot positive reviews on It Follows and I ended up enjoying it. But I didn’t love it as much as others who are putting it among their top films on the year. A great premise for a horror movie though and well worth checking out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 11, 2015 at 10:45 pm
Much obliged! I hear you my friend. It probably won’t make my top of the year list but the premise was indeed a good one and I was very impressed with how David Robert Mitchell chose to shoot it. It felt authentic and personal with a real sense of atmosphere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 11, 2015 at 11:59 pm
I’ll definitely keep an eye out for what this director/writer does next. Hope he continues to do good, original stuff.
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 9:13 am
Same here! I’ll be keeping an eye out. I haven’t actually seen his debut yet but I’ll go back and check that out also.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 1:39 am
I’m with you on this Mark, one of the better horror films to amble its way into cinemas over the last few years. Great review mate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 9:14 am
Cheers Adam. It’s a genre I’m very critical of so its nice to find one that actually hits the spot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 3:41 am
Didn’t like this movie quite as much as you did, but it was a lot of fun. I thought it kind of ran out of gas in its second half, but the first half was pretty awesome. Nice review.
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 9:16 am
Thanks you sir! It did have periodic moments of lethargy and I’m still a bit undecided on the ending but overall I really liked it. Great concept!
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 5:07 am
Glad you liked it Mark. One of the best of the year for me.
Have you seen The Babadook? The hype around that one is real too. And its Aussie ๐ ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 9:22 am
I have seen The Babadook but if truth be told I wasn’t sold on the payoff. Beautifully shot and acted but it’s one where I wasn’t prepared for the direction it took. Worthy of a revisit, though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 9:31 am
I thought the last act was on par with the last act of Rosemary’s Baby! ๐
I didn’t like the ending but that didn’t stop me from buying it. Definitely worth a revisit mate. And you know deep down that Aussie films are the best ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 9:39 am
Rosemary’s Baby? That’s high praise indeed, sir. That’s a classic you’re talking here. I’ll definitely consider your thoughts when I do revisit it. As for Aussie flicks, I’m mightily impressed with your output these days. No doubt about that. But surely the Scots are leading the way in their cinematic output?! ๐
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 10:21 am
I don’t think I have seen a Scottish film, now that I think about it. Any recommendations?
High praise indeed but the way the main character loses her mind in the last act… not as good as Rosemary’s Baby but damned close I thought! I thought the mother was the scariest thing about that movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 12:25 pm
I jest in terms of Scottish output but I always have a soft spot for them as I can identify more with them. Probably the same with yourself and an Aussie flick. I suppose there’s a grey area in terms of a film being called British or Scottish but the likes of Trainspotting, Filth, My Name is Joe, The Angels’ Share and Dear Frankie are all fine Scottish movies in my eyes! There’s actually quite a few to choose from but it tends to be the same faces involved. I’m really looking forward to Robert Carlyle’s directorial debut The Legend of Barney Thomson but I missed it in theatres.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 7:29 pm
Ahh I missed that Barney Thompson movie too! It was playing at a British Film Fest and I bloody missed it. I’ll have to keep an eye out and see if it gets a regular release, it apparently sold a ton of tickets
I love Trainspotting, and Filth is movie I have been meaning to see for a while. I think I’ll add it to The List ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 7:35 pm
Trainspotting is one of my favourite films, man. Supposedly Danny Boyle and the rest of the cast are getting together do the sequel “Porno” but it’s taking some time. As for Barney Thomson, once that left theatres it just disappeared. I can’t seem to track it down at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 7:40 pm
It sounded like a great film too. Hopefully a DVD release surfaces soon.
A sequel called Porno eh? A sequel how? And same here man, with my history of painkiller abuse that movie really hits me hard. Especially the part where he detoxes and sees the baby on the roof. Brings back some harsh memories!
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 7:47 pm
A hard-hitting film, for sure, and a great adaptation of a supposedly unfilmable book. In fact, I done a little Scottish review of it once and the author Irvine Welsh actually stopped by to read. ๐
“Porno” was Welsh’s follow-up. It’s all the same characters and set about 10 years later. Added to which, he also wrote a prequel called “Skagboys” that follows all the characters before heroin comes on the scene. Great books!
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 10:32 pm
I’ll have to check out some of his books, I loved Trainspotting. Gotta get my hands on a copy of Filth (the movie) some time soon, I first read about it ages ago and liked the sound of it
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 13, 2015 at 1:07 am
You might find Welsh’a prose a hard read, to be honest. He writes in an Edinburgh dialect that can be very difficult to understand at times. Definitely check out Filth the movie, though. James McAvoy is tremendous. On a par with DiCaprio in Wolf of Wall Street
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 13, 2015 at 5:17 am
I’ve heard McAvoy is great in it. So when you say he writes in an Edinburgh dialect… do you mean there would be slang I wouldn’t understand?
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 13, 2015 at 9:13 am
Yeah, the slang is pretty full on as he writes in his own native tongue. I’m actually from Glasgow so even the Edinburgh slang is different from my own.
LikeLike
November 13, 2015 at 11:11 am
hmm, interesting stuff. Now I wanna watch Trainspotting for the umpteenth time ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 13, 2015 at 3:08 pm
Ha! I’ve lost count of the amount of times I’ve seen that. It never gets old for me, though. I love it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 13, 2015 at 3:10 pm
Me too ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 8:00 am
I’m surprised there have been quite a few comments where people are ambivalent towards this film; I thought it was really good, as you know, and I’d happily stick that ‘best horror in ages’ tag on it if I actually watched enough of them to say it with confidence. And ‘buttering the muffin’ isn’t one I’ve come across before. Sounds like something Dick Van Dyke would do in Mary Poppins: “Cam on Misses Poppins, ah’ve been dyin’ ta butter yer muffin”.
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 9:24 am
I reckon it could claim the “best horror in ages” tag for the time being, Stu. Very impressively handled all round.
Haha! That Dick Van Dyke scenario sounds very much like the Viz’s Roger Mellie speaking. ๐
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 10:21 am
Hadaway and shite, man!
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 9:57 am
Wonderful review dude. The themes of it sound particularly intriguing and the old school vibe very promising.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 12:21 pm
Cheers Vinnie! The old school vibe works very well here. Earlier in the comments Tom mentioned James Wan’s The Conjuring in terms of restraint but that film also worked because it channeled an old school 70’s vibe. This is more 80’s but it’s a good move. The themes are also cleverly dropped in. It’s a solid little horror flick!
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 12:22 pm
Cheers for the heads up Mark, your posts are so well done and I always find movies that need watching from reading your stuff.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 12:28 pm
Well, I appreciate that mate. Others do far better work than me but I do try to keep things fairly structured. Cheers!
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 12:33 pm
Don’t be so modest man, you do excellent work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 12:40 pm
Thanks again, buddy! It’s always good to hear nice words. Makes it all worthwhile. ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 12:41 pm
I feel the same as you, positive feedback is the best.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 5:24 pm
It certainly helps, man. I need to repay the favour. I’ve been slacking trying to get round so many blogs that I follow but I’ll definitely pop by soon bud!
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 7:05 pm
You rock Mark, I’m looking forward to your presence once more on my blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 3:48 pm
Oh, excellent review. One of the best films of the year – this and Bone Tomahawk prove there can still be so much originality in the horror genre. Glad you liked it too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 12, 2015 at 5:29 pm
Cheers Sati! Happy to hear you’re a fan also. It’s a solid horror and a pleasure to come across a recent one that doesn’t disppoint. Bone Tomahawk is one I still need to catch up with. I’ve heard nothing but positives surrounding that.
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 5:34 pm
Great review! I liked this one a lot. It gives me hope for future horror films. Too bad it won Shitfest! Lol ๐
LikeLike
November 12, 2015 at 5:45 pm
What?! It won Shitfest? How the fuck did that happen? I’m out of touch a little on the blogosphere but there’s no way this is even a shitfest entry, never mind the winner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 13, 2015 at 7:41 pm
Lol! Well, it was a funny review… ๐ But I agree that it’s not a Shitfest-worthy movie. ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 13, 2015 at 8:01 pm
I keep hearing how funny that Shitfest entry is. I’ll check it out!
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 13, 2015 at 1:40 am
I also loved this for many of the same reasons you give, here. And yes, I don’t think it should have been a Shitfest entry, but that particular review was hilarious, so be it. Doesn’t detract from my enjoyment, though. My own review:
http://dellonmovies.blogspot.com/2015/10/it-follows.html
LikeLike
November 13, 2015 at 9:12 am
I need to go back and have a look at that Shitfest one. I’m interested to hear why this is the winner. I thought this was a great little flick. I’ll swing by on your thoughts too, Dell. Cheers!
LikeLike
November 16, 2015 at 10:02 pm
I loved this film; one of my favourites of the year. I’m a big John Carpenter fan, so you can imagine why I loved this so much. It’s such a lovingly crafted flick, made by someone with a real grasp of the genre.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 16, 2015 at 11:24 pm
I’m a big Carpenter fan too, man. After recently revisiting Halloween, the homages really stood out for me in It Follows. It’s an impressive contemporary horror and, like you say, it shows that David Robert Mitchell had been doing his homework on the genre.
LikeLike
December 23, 2015 at 8:41 pm
I enjoyed this. but was more lukewarm than the raves it received. Goodnight Mommy was the best horror film I saw in 2015.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 23, 2015 at 8:52 pm
I really took to this one, especially after a recent revisit to Carpenter’s Halloween.
I eventually caught up with Goodnight Mommy too but I have to say that I wasn’t as impressed as I thought I’d be. It had a great ending, though. One I didn’t see coming.
LikeLike