The Skin I Live In * * * * *
Director: Pedro Almodovar.
Screenplay: Pedro Almodovar, Agustin Almodovar.
Starring: Antonio Banderas, Elena Anaya, Marisa Paredes, Jan Cornet, Roberto Alamo, Blanca Suarez.
Any time I approach a film by director Pedro Almodovar, I know straight away that I’ll have to pay attention. He explores difficult and heavy themes but does them with such style and attention to detail that his craftsmanship cannot be ignored. For anyone wondering whether he achieves the same level of quality with this recent effort, then wonder no more. He does and more so.
Robert Ledgard (Antonio Banderas) is a plastic surgeon who has perfected a new form of artificial skin. The problem with Ledgard though, is that he’s not entirely healthy of mind and as a test subject, he holds Vera (Elena Anaya) captive in his home to conduct his experiments. However, the arrival of a wanted criminal makes an appearance at his home which brings forth the dark history of the doctor and patient and how they came to be in their current situation.
Something that I have always tried to avoid when writing down my thoughts on a film is treading into spoiler territory. This is certainly one of those films that’s difficult to write about without giving away major parts of the plot. Suffice to say, Almodovar himself described the film as “a horror story without screams or frights” that was loosely based on the novel “Tarantula” by French writer Thierry Jonquet and inspired by Georges Franju’s 1960 film “Eyes Without a Face“. It also has an odd David Lynch feel to it, or more to the point, Lynch’s daughter Jennifer and her 1993 movie “Boxing Helena” (much more accomplished than that of course) In different hands this film could have fell into torture porn territory and ended up hitting the straight to DVD slasher shelf but with Almodovar at the helm, it takes on a whole new shape and form. His ability to construct an elaborate narrative cannot be questioned and he commands an audiences attention, while teasingly, revealing the layers to his story. Quite simply, he’s an artist! That statement alone should be enough to simplify this highly creative director’s impressive catalogue. Scenes are shot with such an eye for detailed beauty that you’d be forgiven for being reminded of classical pieces of art as he frames his picture like an expressionist painter. The production design is superb and visually, the film is simply beautiful. The beautiful look isn’t reflected in the material though. This is dark stuff and despite being, both shocking and bizarre, it possesses a sense of humour – all be it, a sick one. Almodovar’s recurrent themes and probing of the human psyche are also explored; masochism, transgender issues and repressed sexuality but ultimately this is a modern, twisted take on the Frankenstein story and one that he imbues with style and creative flair. But nothing is black and white here, he even toys with the morality of the audience in clever use of the Stockholm syndrome in which a hostage begins to identify with and grow sympathetic to their captor. As always with Almodovar though, there are a major plot developments that throw his films off-kilter and take such dramatic turns that they quite near takes your breath away. To reveal any more would be completely irresponsible and wholly unfair of me but rest assured that this is thought provoking filmmaking and a craftsman plying his trade at a very high standard. He’s also aided by superb performances by his leads; Elena Anaya could well be the next Penelope Cruz and it’s great to see Banderas deliver such an intense and brooding character, making you wonder why he and the Spanish auteur have waited 21 years before collaborating again here.
A provocative and macabre near masterpiece from Almodovar. It’s one worthy of attention and arguably his finest film to date.
Mark Walker
MARKED MOVIES 
August 16, 2012 at 12:32 pm
Great to have you back Mark! This is a big endorsement and I’m going to have to check it out. I’ve pushed this film back multiple times but judging by your review it’s worth seeing. I’m on it.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 12:43 pm
Thanks Keith. Yeah, I took a wee break man but back at it again now. I put this this film off for a while as well. Not that I wasn’t interested but because Almodovar always demands your attention. I wanted to be ready for it and I was. It’s a brilliant film that’s quite possibly my favourite of his. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to write about without giving too much away. I look forward to your take on it bro.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 12:39 pm
I actually had to watch this one twice since my first experience with it was a 9am showing on the final day of TIFF last year…which meant I was wickedly tired and super susceptible to confusion.
I still liked the heck out of it that first time through, and flat-out loved it on my second watch.
I easily put this in a pile with Almodovar’s very best.
Great review!
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 12:46 pm
Cheers Ryan. As much as I took a lot from this first time, I suspect I’ll like it even more on a second sitting. I totally agree with you, it’s one of his very best and great to see Banderas on form too. Why was this ignored come awards season? It’s top quality stuff.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 1:59 pm
Very difficult film to approach without giving too much away. Great job on a great film. This one blew me away when I watched it.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 2:04 pm
Cheers Andy! It really knocked my socks off too. I found it very difficult writing about it without disclosing important info but hopefully I still got my point across without ruining it for people.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 2:07 pm
I think you did a commendable job on writing on it without covering too much about it (if that makes sense).
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 2:11 pm
That does makes sense. If anything I thought I divulged a little but not overly that it would ruin the film.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 2:51 pm
Nice, I really like him but I hadn’t heard of this. Your review is excellent – thanks for the recommendation!
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 3:00 pm
It’s a great film Misty. It didnt do it for some people but I really enjoy Almodovar’s stuff and this is one of his finest in my opinion.
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 1:25 am
I have the entire house to myself this weekend, roommate free, so I’m planning some movie marathoning – I’m gonna try to fit this one in!
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 6:30 am
I really hope you do get a chance to see this Misty. Keep me posted on your thoughts. I’m eager to hear everyone’s take on this one. Good luck. 🙂
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 2:58 pm
I wasn’t too sure that the way they told this story was the best way possible for it, but it still kept my interest and had me wondering what was going to happen next with this unpredictable story. Also, Banderas kicks ass and is definitely on the high-road for a comeback. Nice review Mark.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 3:04 pm
Cheers Dan. I totally agree on Banderas, he’s superb in this an let’s hope it is a revival for him. Another one with Pedro wouldn’t go amiss that’s for sure.
I’ve heard a few criticisms of this film and it’s extremity or character development but I thought there were far deeper meanings that deserve to be explored. I loved it.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 6:34 pm
Look who’s back bloggin’ again, nice to see you back Mark!
I haven’t seen this one but I’m so curious about it. The subject matter sounds heartbreaking and eerie though. Banderas seems to be on top form here. He’s actually more versatile than most people think, he’s quite funny in Ruby Sparks too. Now that I think of it, he’s quite prolific as well.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 6:41 pm
Thanks Ruth! I’m glad to be back. I missed the interaction with everyone.
I really hope you check this one out. I know that the subject matter may be dark but it artistically handled and I wouldn’t say it’s gratuitous. I love Almodovar’s stuff and this is one of his best.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 7:20 pm
I trust your judgment Mark. I’ll be giving this one a watch. I quite like Banderas but not really familiar w/ Almodovar’s work.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 7:26 pm
Almodovar’s work is certainly worth looking into Ruth. He deals with very adult themes and although this film contains some sex scenes (one which is a bit graphic but brief) he handles the material very competently and doesn’t resort to cheap shock material. It’s a highly accomplished film.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 6:48 pm
thanks mark, you’re glowing review has now turned me from a distantly curious maybe about this, to an “ooooo i must watch this now”. well done and grrrrrreat review!
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 6:49 pm
“your glowing review”
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 7:22 pm
Kind words indeed my friend. Thank you.
I implore you to see this if you enjoy challenging European cinema. It’s one of the best film’s of last year.
So is that “your glowing…” and not “you are glowing” then? Lol. Either way, cheers buddy.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 8:03 pm
I will, and yeh, “your” as in belonging to. ha ha ha!
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 8:08 pm
Haha. Ive got ye bro!
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 7:50 pm
Love to be able to say that I shared your enthusiasm! It was a 5/5 for me too and ended up as my second best movie in 2011.
Tricky to write about though. I went into it blindly, which gave me a great experience. I would actually love to watch it again now that I have a better understanding of what’s happening the first 30 minutes. I was a bit clueless in the beginning…
Shameless plug:
https://thevelvetcafe.wordpress.com/2011/12/08/the-skin-i-live-in-not-the-centipede-movie-i-had-feared/
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 8:00 pm
Love to share your enthusiasm also Jessica. Once again we seem to agree. Like yourself, I went into it blind and avoided as much about it as possible. I’m so glad I was able to now. I’d a imagine a rewatch would just improve upon it, if thats even possible.
I’ll swing by in a bit and check out your always welcome plugs. 😉
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 12:30 am
Great review, glad you enjoyed the movie so much! It’s my favorite Almodovar – so eerie, complex and beautifully shot. I love the score – it added so much to the movie. Interesting that you say Anaya could be new Cruz – Cruz waas actually going to play her part, but she got pregnant.
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 6:28 am
Thanks Sati. I’m looking forward to seeing it again where I’m sure I’ll be able to pick up more but I totally agree with you. After some deliberation, this is my favourite of Almodovar’s also. He’s done so many great film’s but this one captured me the most. In some ways I’m glad Cruz didn’t get the role, as good as she is I thought Anaya was superb. Banderas was also outstanding.
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 2:19 am
Fantastic review! One of the best films by one of my personal favorites, Mr. Almodóvar (simply a genius).
“It also has an odd David Lynch feel to it…In different hands this film could have fell into torture porn territory and ended up hitting the straight to DVD slasher shelf but with Almodovar at the helm, it takes on a whole new shape and form. His ability to construct an elaborate narrative cannot be questioned and he commands an audiences attention, while teasingly, revealing the layers to his story. Quite simply, he’s an artist! That statement alone should be enough to simplify this highly creative director’s impressive catalogue. Scenes are shot with such an eye for detailed beauty that you’d be forgiven for being reminded of classical pieces of art as he frames his picture like an expressionist painter. The production design is superb and visually, the film is simply beautiful.” I wholeheartedly agree.
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 6:31 am
Haha. Thank you Fernando. That’s pretty much the whole review you agree with then? 😉 I’m with you though, Almodovar is a genius.
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 9:03 am
Nice write up buddy. A film I heard a lot of buzz about on some big sites but I still haven’t got round to seeing. Love Banderas so will have to get it watched now as you have made this sound great!
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 9:18 am
Thanks my man. It is great and definitely worth seeking out. If you’re familiar with Almodovar then you’ll know the quality to expect but if you’re not familiar, it’s a good place to start.
LikeLike
August 17, 2012 at 10:17 am
To be honest I don’t think I have seen any of his previous work, but the plot to this sounds more like what I go for, so was always very intrigued to catch it. Will have to try get it watched!
LikeLike
August 18, 2012 at 3:30 am
I haven’t seen a single film from Almodovar. Alas, you have me intrigued Mark.
Glad to have you back.
LikeLike
August 18, 2012 at 7:28 am
Thanks Sam. It’s good to be back.
You are doing yourself a disservice by not getting into Almodovar man. He’s done some fantastic stuff. Theres no time like the present to remedy that and I doubt you’ll be disappointed.
LikeLike
August 19, 2012 at 2:43 pm
I’m interested in seeing this film, and you fine review only reinforces that. Thanks, Mark.
LikeLike
August 19, 2012 at 6:16 pm
Thanks Michael. I wholly recommended this and and I’d love to hear your extensive take on it. I found it hard to write about it without giving too much away. Almodovar is an artist and no mistake. I hope you get around to it. It’s certainly one of the best film’s of 2011.
LikeLike
August 20, 2012 at 4:23 pm
Haven’t seen this one but after reading this I really need to.
LikeLike
August 20, 2012 at 4:46 pm
Thanks Vinnie. It’s certainly worth checking out. For me, it was certainly one of the best films of last year.
LikeLike
August 25, 2012 at 4:34 pm
I like your Frankenstein comparison, that isn’t something I thought about when reviewing the film. You did well to avoid spoilers too. I thought the film was excellent and you’re right to call Almodovar an artist. The film also opened my eyes to the delightful Elena Anaya and caused me to rent Room in Rome which was a mistake!
LikeLike
August 25, 2012 at 5:02 pm
Yeah, definitely a Frankenstein thing going on but very artfully done. I loved this film. It’s so loaded with detail and possibly Almodovar’s finest in my eyes. Thanks for stopping by Tom.
LikeLike